Real-life test of the world’s cheapest SSD was so bad, a hard drive would probably beat it — which is what the reviewer actually did and broke the poor thing in two
The $3 Goldenfir 2.5-inch SATA SSD feels and runs like a relic from the distant past
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
WithAmazon Prime Daynow here, you’re likely to be considering all kinds of deals for thecheapest SSDsout there right now. But just because something’s cheap, that doesn’t mean it’s worth buying – as the Goldenfir SSD proves.
This $3 SSD – available on AliExpress – has a 120GB capacity and may seem far too good to be true. But that’s because it is, according toStorage Review, which analyzed its specifications and tested the device extensively.
Goldenfir claims it offers read speeds of 550MB/s and write speeds of up to 510MB/s, thanks to its YS9083XT SSD controller – which supports multiple types of NAND Flash memory and a variety of form factors. The Goldenfir SSD is, specifically a 2.5-inch SATA SSD.
Goldenfir’s $3 SSD is the opposite of a must-buy
Its reported speeds, according to the manufacturer, aren’t super slow, but they’re nothing like the fastest SSDs out there. In theory, at least, they’re actually more akin to speeds recorded when the first consumer-grade SSDs hit the market. But how does that work in practice?
Storage Review tested the SSD with aLenovoThinkSystem SR635 server, fitted with anAMD7742 CPU and 512GBDDR4 RAM, and compared it with theKingston DC600M– an industry-leading enterprise storage device.
The drive registered a score of 554MB/s and 518MB/s for reads and writes respectively on CrystalDiskMark – which is not bad at all considering the Kingston DC600M SSD scored 557MB/s and 541MB/s.
But the catch is the benchmarking software may have generated an inflated score due to the way it was configured (it leveraged host-side cache). Other metrics produced awful results, and the device even snapped in half during testing.
Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
In4Krandom read and write benchmarking, the Goldenfir severely underperformed – and demonstrated terrible latency, which was backed up by 64K sequential tests.
In the former testing, it hit 13,000 IOPS with 10,225ms latency for reads, while Kingston hit 780,000 IOPs and 1,630ms latency. For writes, it was even worse, barely creeping beyond 5,000 IOPs and peaking at 14,000ms latency.
This pattern continued, with the Goldenfir even producing abysmal results against other budget SSDs. The $33Intel670p 2TB Gen3 SSD, for example, hit a peak of 473,000 IOPS at 264ms for the 4K random reads test.
More from TechRadar PRo
Keumars Afifi-Sabet is the Technology Editor for Live Science. He has written for a variety of publications including ITPro, The Week Digital and ComputerActive. He has worked as a technology journalist for more than five years, having previously held the role of features editor with ITPro. In his previous role, he oversaw the commissioning and publishing of long form in areas including AI, cyber security, cloud computing and digital transformation.
Google puts Nvidia on high alert as it showcases Trillium, its rival AI chip, while promising to bring H200 Tensor Core GPUs within days
A new form of macOS malware is being used by devious North Korean hackers
This new malware utilizes a rare programming language to evade traditional detection methods
